Nakagawa 130927

        

  Jun. 5, 2017

Dear TRIZ Colleagues,

    Toru Nakagawa

         Professor Emeritus, Osaka Gakuin University

"TRIZ Home Page in Japan" has been updated last night (dated Jun. 4) in English and in Japanese pages.

            http://www.osaka-gu.ac.jp/php/nakagawa/TRIZ/eTRIZ/

[1] Introductions of Individual Papers of ETRIA TFC 2016:

  1. Promotion of TRIZ in Industries (5 Papers)
  2. Usage of TRIZ in Education and in Academia (5 Papers)

     Toru Nakagawa)

          

[2] Letters from Readers(Feb. - Apr. 2017) : Added in the English page: from 2 readers + Toru

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Conference Report (31) - Papers D and E: Personal Report of ETRIA TFC 2016:

 

Introductions of Individual Papers:

Introductions of the papers presented at TFC2016 are written by Toru Nakagawa in English.

Here are 5 papers in Category D, and 5 more in Category E.

  •  marks are highly recommended.
  1. Promotion of TRIZ in Industries (5 Papers)

D1. ● A long-term strategy to spread TRIZ in SMEs. Analysis of Bergamo's experience:
Davide Russo, Daniele Regazzoni, Caterina Rizzi (Italy)

D2. Combining TRIZ and open innovation, a new promising perspective for enhancing corporate innovation processes:
Masih Hanifi, Remy Houssin, Denis Cavallucci, Simon Fuhlhaber (France)

D3. R&D in Poland ? is the country close to a knowledge-driven economy?:
Dorota Chybowska, Leszek Chybowski (Poland)

D4. Is Poland an innovative country?:
Dorota Chybowska, Leszek Marek Chybowski (Poland)

D5. ● Why TRIZ Popularity is Declining:
Sergey Sobolev, Oleg Abramov (Russia)

  1. Usage of TRIZ in Education and in Academia (5 Papers)

E1. A Brief Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (BTIPS) - an Approach in Teaching, Learning and Practice:
Zbigniew Marian Bzymek (USA)

E2. ● Aspects of teaching TRIZ:
Christoph Dobrusskin (The Netherlands)

E3. Product development using heuristic-systematic approach: a case study:
Bartosz Pryda, Marek Mysior (Poland)

E4. ● Development of creative education materials for students at middle and high school using design thinking process with simplified TRIZ:
Kyeongwon LEE (South Korea)

E5. ● Idea Generation with Substance-Field Analysis: the Influence of Prior Knowledge and Practical Experience:
Iouri Belski, Anne Skiadopoulos, Guillermo Aranda-Mena (Australia), Gaetano Cascini, Davide Russo (Italy)
(Note: This paper E5 is about "Importance of General Knowledge in Creative Idea Generation: An Experiment and Discussions")

[2] TRIZ Forum: Letters from Readers(Feb. - Apr. 2017

[Added in the English page]

Min-Gyu Lee (Korea & Finland), Giuseppe Carignani (Italy), Toru Nakagawa

  1. Lee communicated with me on my Introduction to his ETRIA TFC 2016 paper; it's a pleasure for me that the Author appreciates my Introduction article.
  1. Carignani is going to have a chance to talk on TRIZ to high school teachers and asks me for some references.

I suggested the Entrance page for Children and High school students of this site.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Toru Nakagawa, Dr., Professor Emeritus, Osaka Gakuin University

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. [Main email address. for receiving.]

       This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.   [for sending]

Editor of the "TRIZ Home Page in Japan":

   URL:http://www.osaka-gu.ac.jp/php/nakagawa/TRIZ/eTRIZ/

Director of CrePS Institute:

   Publication of "TRIZ Practices and Benefits" book series (in Japanese)

   3-1-13 Eirakudai, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0086, Japan.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Haydn Shaughnessy, Contributor,

“I write about enterprise innovation”

Tech 3/07/2013 @ 6:32AM |50,392 views Forbes Magazine

Full article at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2013/03/07/why-is-samsung-such-an-innovative-company/

Samsung is a global leader in screen technology, TVs, batteries, and chip design. So in terms of innovation it is doing a lot right. But we know very little about how.

Two developments convinced the company in the late 1990s and early 2000s that they could adopt a systematic approach to innovation and that is what seems to underpin their current success.

The first development provides a broader explanation for Samsung’s innovation capacity. In the late 1990s they were able to tap into a source of cheap scientific expertise in the former Soviet Union.

In 2009 BusinessWeek reported that Samsung relied on its relationships with Russian experts for its smartphone software development, adding: “Russian brains helped Samsung develop the image-processing chips in its digital TVs and refine its frequency-filtering technology that significantly reduced noise on its now-ubiquitous handsets.”

But a second effect of the relationship with Russian science was the introduction of TRIZ, an innovation method that Samsung adopted from 2000 onwards but which only reached American companies from the mid-2000s onwards (Intel is a user).

TRIZ is a methodology for systematic problem solving. Typical of its origins in Russia, it asks users to seek the contradictions in current technological conditions and customer needs and to imagine an ideal state that innovation should drive towards.

Samsung had early successes with TRIZ, saving over $100 million in its first few projects. It was also adopting Six Sigma at the time.

But it was TRIZ that became the bedrock of innovation at Samsung. And it was introduced at Samsung by Russian engineers whom Samsung had hired into its Seoul Labs in the early 2000s.

In 2003 TRIZ led to 50 new patents for Samsung and in 2004 one project alone, a DVD pick-up innovation, saved Samsung over $100 million. TRIZ is now an obligatory skill set if you want to advance within Samsung.

At the Samsung Advanced Institute for Technology, Hyo June Kim, who wrote The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, a foundation text on TRIZ published in Korean, trained over 1,000 engineers across Samsung companies in 2004 alone.                  

What we know from this is how Samsung approaches innovation. Rather it is based on developing a creative elite. This explains how Samsung used TRIZ to get to its Super AMOLED displays.

Samsung Electronics has a sense of crisis that we have been a fast follower and we can not survive anymore in this position. Instead of leading the industry by developing innovative products, we have followed fast what the leading companies had developed. Top management pointed out this and asked employee not to be a fast follower, but to be an innovative leader.

At Samsung even the subsidiary CEO has to take TRIZ training. From looking at the various presentations I estimate that engineers get about 15 days of training plus 7 days specific project work. That’s quite an investment in method and people.

So the answer to why Samsung is so innovative – with at least two major product announcements this month – is that it is heavily invested in its people, it goes in search of special talent wherever it can find it, but specifically made astute moves into Russia early on; it targets its innovations towards specific competitors and patents that it wants to overhaul (as Apple did under Jobs); and it has an innovation culture based on extensive training, repeatable methodology and creative elite formation, backed by the highest levels of management.

To read the full article, click the link above.